Genetically modified coffee confrontation brewing in Hawaii

by Erica Strauss

This article was originally published in June 2009

Coffee beans

GM coffee would hurt small farmers who rely on growing and picking coffee for their income.

(June 2009) — Our morning coffee is brewed from beans grown by 25 million producers in the tropics, primarily in hand-tended backyard plots. On the island of Oahu, Hawaii, biotechnologists from Integrated Coffee Technology Inc. (ICTI). want to change all that.

Good coffee depends on quality coffee cherries picked when the fruit is red and shiny — neither green nor overripe. Coffee fruit doesn’t ripen simultaneously, so the best quality coffee must be hand-harvested.

This is expensive and time-consuming, so for 10 years ICTI has worked to genetically modify (GM) coffee plants, altering the coffee cherry’s natural ripening process. Farmers would trigger final ripening of the fruit — all at once — with ethylene sprays.

Critics say spray-ripened coffee risks increasing the gap between small producers and agribusiness, putting farm workers out of business.

According to Swiss-based watchdog organization Berne Declaration, “Those who rely on picking coffee for their income will suffer when plantations take up mechanized harvesting and reduce their workforce. [Therefore] if there is a commercial advantage of GM coffee, the gain will be made in the agribusiness sector. Smallholder farmers could find their profits further eroded.”

Even ICTI acknowledges these concerns: “It has been suggested that controlled ripening coffee favors large landholders over small or so-called ‘subsistence’ farmers in underdeveloped countries. Controlled ripening coffee plants could face political resistance in those countries.”

ICTI also altered coffee trees to yield caffeine-free beans. The company hopes a GM caffeine-free bean will eliminate the need for chemical or water-based decaffeination and possibly provide a more flavorful decaf coffee.

ICTI maintains that its decaf and spray-ripened coffee will have production and quality benefits for small-scale coffee farmers as well as larger plantations and agribusiness powerhouses such as Nestlé and Kraft. But just an island away from ICTI’s Oahu test fields, growers of the prestigious and expensive Kona coffee aren’t so sure.

Kona growers are deeply concerned that GM coffee will cross-pollinate and contaminate their crop, rendering their beans much less valuable. GM-tainted beans likely would be rejected in Japan and much of Europe, key export markets.

Kona farmers have reason to be concerned. Greenpeace International estimates more than 200 cases of GM crop contamination have occurred in 57 countries over the last 10 years. Widespread contamination of rice in 2006 with an unapproved GM rice variety led to millions of dollars in export losses, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists.

When StarLink corn, a GM variety approved only as animal feed, was found in the human food supply, more than 300 kinds of chips and flour were recalled.

Even closer to home for the Kona growers, when a GM papaya variety was introduced in Hawaii, the Japanese and Canadian market for exported Hawaiian papaya dried up. Organic papaya growers concerned about pollen drift found high levels of GM contamination in their crop, leading to even greater market losses worldwide.

John Stiles, CEO of ICTI, doesn’t see the risk. Last year, Stiles told the Honolulu Star Bulletin, “Our field trials would have absolutely no effect on Kona coffee, so it doesn’t really make sense to ban field trials of transgenic coffee across the whole state … we don’t want to be known as the anti-technology state.”

The Hawaii State Legislature agreed with Stiles and in March 2008 rejected a statewide ban on GM coffee. In October, pressured by the Kona Coffee Farmers Association, the Hawaii County Council banned GM crops on the Big Island.

For now, no GM coffee can be grown legally on the Big Island but ICTI field trials of decaffeinated coffee were slated to start on Oahu in early 2009. According to filings, ICTI expects to produce its first cup of genetically modified, caffeine-free coffee in 2010.

If trials go well, ICTI will sell GM caffeine-free plants to growers in 2011 and the first GM decaf beans will hit the market in 2014. ICTI continues to move forward with its spray-ripened coffee as well, and expects to begin selling plants with ethylene-controlled ripening traits in 2012.

Erica Strauss is a personal chef, free-lance writer and PCC member who is passionate about food with integrity.

Also in this issue

Choosing sustainable and healthy seafood

Choosing seafood that is both sustainable and healthy can be challenging. Is it farmed or wild? Troll-caught or trawled? Alaskan or Chilean? Healthy or toxic? There are so many questions — it’s enough to confuse even the most conscientious consumer.

The economic value of farmland

Until now, the costs of pollution and exploitation of finite resources haven’t been factored into the price of food. Profits are privatized while the cost to the environment is externalized to the public. It doesn’t have to be this way. Farmland needs to have its value recognized as more than just a source of food. In some places, that is being done.

Raw food vitality

As the author of a vegetarian dining guidebook, I’ve had the pleasure of eating many exceptional meals over the years. But one of the most memorable meals I’ve ever had was not at a restaurant. Rather, it was a raw foods potluck a decade or so ago at a friend’s house here in Seattle.